Weighing the two stellar components of the Galactic Bulge

TL;DR

This study quantifies the mass contributions and spatial distributions of the metal-poor and metal-rich stellar components in the Galactic bulge, revealing their distinct kinematic and structural properties and implications for bulge formation models.

Contribution

First measurement of the fractional stellar mass contributions of MP and MR components across the Galactic bulge area, highlighting their different spatial and kinematic characteristics.

Findings

MP stars constitute 48% of the bulge mass within |l|<10, |b|<9.5.

MR stars dominate at intermediate latitudes but are marginal in the outer bulge.

MP component is more axisymmetric and possibly dominant in the inner bulge.

Abstract

Recent spectroscopic surveys of the Galactic bulge have unambiguously shown that the bulge contains two main components, that are best separated in their iron content, but also differ in spatial distribution, kinematics, and abundance ratios. The so-called metal poor (MP) component peaks at [Fe/H]~-0.4, while the metal rich (MR) one peaks at [Fe/H]$~+0.3. The total metallicity distribution function is therefore bimodal, with a dip at [Fe/H]~0. The relative fraction of the two components changes significantly across the bulge area. We provide, for the first time, the fractional contribution of the MP and MR stars to the stellar mass budget of the Galactic bulge, and its variation across the bulge area. We find that MP stars make up 48% of the total stellar mass of the bulge, within the region |l|<10, |b|<9.5, with the remaining 52% made up of MR stars. The latter dominate the mass budget at intermediate latitudes |b|~4, but become marginal in the outer bulge (|b|>8). The MP component is more axisymmetric than the MR one, and it is at least comparable, and possibly slightly dominant in the inner few degrees. As a result, the MP component, which does not follow the main bar, is not marginal in terms of the total mass budget as previously thought, and this new observational evidence must be included in bulge models. While the total radial velocity dispersion has a trend that follows the total stellar mass, when we examine the velocity dispersion of each component individually, we find that MP stars have higher velocity dispersion where they make up a smaller fraction of the stellar mass, and viceversa. This is due to the kinematical and spatial distribution of the two metallicity component being significantly different, as already discussed in the literature.