Confidence Intervals for Testing Disparate Impact in Fair Learning
Philippe Besse, Eustasio del Barrio, Paula Gordaliza and, Jean-Michel Loubes

TL;DR
This paper derives the asymptotic distribution of key metrics for assessing disparate impact in machine learning, emphasizing the importance of confidence intervals over single-point estimates for fair testing.
Contribution
It introduces the asymptotic distribution of disparity metrics and advocates for confidence interval usage in testing group disparate impact.
Findings
Confidence intervals provide more reliable testing of disparate impact.
Asymptotic distribution formulas enable better statistical inference.
Illustrative examples demonstrate the importance of confidence intervals.
Abstract
We provide the asymptotic distribution of the major indexes used in the statistical literature to quantify disparate treatment in machine learning. We aim at promoting the use of confidence intervals when testing the so-called group disparate impact. We illustrate on some examples the importance of using confidence intervals and not a single value.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
