Planck 2018 results. XII. Galactic astrophysics using polarized dust emission
Planck Collaboration: N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. I. R. Alves, M., Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. B., Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, K. Benabed, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P., Bielewicz, J. J. Bock, J. R. Bond, J. Borrill, F. R. Bouchet

TL;DR
This paper presents full-sky polarization maps of Galactic dust emission from Planck 2018 data, analyzing magnetic field structure, dust properties, and their relation to gas density, providing constraints for dust models.
Contribution
It offers detailed polarization maps and insights into magnetic field topology, dust alignment, and optical properties, advancing understanding of Galactic dust in diffuse regions.
Findings
Maximum polarization fraction is 22% at 80 arcmin resolution.
Inverse correlation between polarization fraction and angle dispersion.
Weak dependence of dust optical properties on gas column density.
Abstract
We present 353 GHz full-sky maps of the polarization fraction , angle , and dispersion of angles of Galactic dust thermal emission produced from the 2018 release of Planck data. We confirm that the mean and maximum of decrease with increasing . The uncertainty on the maximum polarization fraction, % at 80 arcmin resolution, is dominated by the uncertainty on the zero level in total intensity. The observed inverse behaviour between and is interpreted with models of the polarized sky that include effects from only the topology of the turbulent Galactic magnetic field. Thus, the statistical properties of , , and mostly reflect the structure of the magnetic field. Nevertheless, we search for potential signatures of varying grain alignment and dust properties. First, we analyse the product map , looking for residual…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
