The Orbit of the Close Companion of Polaris: Hubble Space Telescope Imaging 2007 to 2014
Nancy Remage Evans (1), Margarita Karovska (1), Howard E. Bond (2 and, 3), Gail H. Schaefer (4), Kailash C. Sahu (3), Jennifer Mack (3), Edmund P., Nelan (3), Alexandre Gallenne (5), and Evan D. Tingle (1) ((1) Smithsonian, Astrophys. Obs., (2) Penn State University

TL;DR
This study uses Hubble Space Telescope imaging over several years to refine the orbit and mass of Polaris's close companion, revealing a lower-than-expected Cepheid mass and raising questions about its evolutionary history.
Contribution
The paper provides updated orbital parameters and dynamical mass measurements for Polaris, utilizing multi-epoch HST imaging and PSF deconvolution techniques, and discusses implications for stellar evolution models.
Findings
Dynamical mass of Polaris Cepheid is approximately 3.45 solar masses.
Polaris's mass is lower than evolutionary predictions from HR diagram fitting.
The system's third star, Polaris B, appears older, suggesting a possible binary merger history.
Abstract
As part of a program to determine dynamical masses of Cepheids, we have imaged the nearest and brightest Cepheid, Polaris, with the Hubble Space Telescope Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 and Wide Field Camera 3. Observations were obtained at three epochs between 2007 and 2014. In these images, as in HST frames obtained in 2005 and 2006, which we discussed in a 2008 paper, we resolve the close companion Polaris Ab from the Cepheid Polaris Aa. Because of the small separation and large magnitude difference between Polaris Aa and Ab, we used PSF deconvolution techniques to carry out astrometry of the binary. Based on these new measurements, we have updated the elements for the 29.59 yr orbit. Adopting the distance to the system from the recent Gaia Data Release 2, we find a dynamical mass for the Cepheid of 3.45 +/- 0.75 Msun, although this is preliminary, and will be improved by CHARA…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
