Evolution of galaxy size--stellar mass relation from the Kilo Degree Survey
N. Roy, N.R. Napolitano, F. La Barbera, C. Tortora, F. Getman, M., Radovich, M. Capaccioli, M. Brescia, S. Cavuoti, G. Longo, M.A. Raj, E., Puddu, G. Covone, V. Amaro, C. Vellucci, A. Grado, K. Kuijken, G. Verdoes, Kleijn, E. Valentijn

TL;DR
This study analyzes the evolution of galaxy sizes and stellar masses using a large sample from the KiDS survey, revealing significant changes in massive spheroids and milder evolution in disc galaxies up to redshift 0.6.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale analysis of galaxy size-mass evolution across different galaxy types using KiDS data, with classifications based on spectral and structural properties.
Findings
Massive spheroids show significant size and mass evolution up to z ~ 0.6.
Less massive spheroids and disc galaxies exhibit milder or no evolution.
Results are consistent with hydrodynamical simulations and previous smaller studies.
Abstract
We have obtained structural parameters of about 340,000 galaxies from the Kilo Degree Survey (KiDS) in 153 square degrees of data release 1, 2 and 3. We have performed a seeing convolved 2D single S\'ersic fit to the galaxy images in the 4 photometric bands (u, g, r, i) observed by KiDS, by selecting high signal-to-noise ratio (S/N > 50) systems in every bands. We have classified galaxies as spheroids and disc-dominated by combining their spectral energy distribution properties and their S\'ersic index. Using photometric redshifts derived from a machine learning technique, we have determined the evolution of the effective radius, \Re\ and stellar mass, \mst, versus redshift, for both mass complete samples of spheroids and disc-dominated galaxies up to z ~ 0.6. Our results show a significant evolution of the structural quantities at intermediate redshift for the massive spheroids…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
