An $\ell-p$ switch trick to obtain a new elementary proof of a criterion for arithmetic equivalence
Tristram Bogart, Guillermo Mantilla-Soler

TL;DR
This paper presents an elementary proof that two number fields are arithmetically equivalent if they have the same number of prime factors for almost all primes, using an innovative l-p switch trick and classical Smith's result.
Contribution
It introduces a new elementary proof of a criterion for arithmetic equivalence based on prime factor counts, simplifying previous complex arguments.
Findings
Elementary proof of arithmetic equivalence criterion
Use of l-p switch trick for proof
Connection to classical Smith's result
Abstract
Two number fields are called arithmetically equivalent if they have the same Dedekind zeta function. In the 1970's Perlis showed that this is equivalent to the condition that for almost every rational prime the arithmetic type of is the same in each field. In the 1990's Perlis and Stuart gave an unexpected characterization for arithmetic equivalence; they showed that to be arithmetically equivalent it is enough for almost every prime to have the same number of prime factors in each field. Here, using an switch trick, we provide an elementary proof of that fact based on a classical result of Smith from the 1870's.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Mathematics and Applications · Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
