True Contextuality Beats Direct Influences in Human Decision Making
Irina Basieva, V\'ictor H. Cervantes, Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Andrei, Khrennikov

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates true contextuality in human decision making through crowdsourcing experiments, showing that some behaviors cannot be explained solely by direct influences, unlike previous studies.
Contribution
It presents new experimental evidence of true contextuality in human judgments, extending the application of the Contextuality-by-Default theory.
Findings
All previous human judgment studies' context-dependence explained by direct influences.
New experiments show clear evidence of true contextuality in simple decisions.
Demonstrates that human decision making can exhibit quantum-like contextuality.
Abstract
In quantum physics there are well-known situations when measurements of the same property in different contexts (under different conditions) have the same probability distribution, but cannot be represented by one and the same random variable. Such systems of random variables are called contextual. More generally, true contextuality is observed when different contexts force measurements of the same property (in psychology, responses to the same question) to be more dissimilar random variables than warranted by the difference of their distributions. The difference in distributions is itself a form of context-dependence, but of another nature: it is attributable to direct causal influences exerted by contexts upon the random variables. The Contextuality-by-Default (CbD) theory allows one to separate true contextuality from direct influences in the overall context-dependence. The CbD…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
