TL;DR
This paper introduces Robust Chauvenet Rejection (RCR), a sequential outlier rejection method that combines multiple measures of central tendency and deviation to effectively identify outliers in contaminated data, even with high contamination levels.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel sequential outlier rejection technique called RCR that improves robustness and precision over traditional methods like Chauvenet rejection.
Findings
RCR effectively handles high contamination levels.
Sequential measures improve outlier detection accuracy.
Applicable to weighted data and model fitting.
Abstract
Sigma clipping is commonly used in astronomy for outlier rejection, but the number of standard deviations beyond which one should clip data from a sample ultimately depends on the size of the sample. Chauvenet rejection is one of the oldest, and simplest, ways to account for this, but, like sigma clipping, depends on the sample's mean and standard deviation, neither of which are robust quantities: Both are easily contaminated by the very outliers they are being used to reject. Many, more robust measures of central tendency, and of sample deviation, exist, but each has a tradeoff with precision. Here, we demonstrate that outlier rejection can be both very robust and very precise if decreasingly robust but increasingly precise techniques are applied in sequence. To this end, we present a variation on Chauvenet rejection that we call "robust" Chauvenet rejection (RCR), which uses three…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
