Optimal designs for frequentist model averaging
Kira Alhorn, Kirsten Schorning, Holger Dette

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new optimal design criterion for experiments that improves the accuracy of model averaging estimates in regression analysis under model uncertainty, achieving up to 45% reduction in mean squared error.
Contribution
It proposes a novel optimality criterion for experimental design that minimizes the asymptotic mean squared error of model averaging estimators, with established necessary conditions and practical illustrations.
Findings
Bayesian optimal designs can reduce mean squared error by up to 45%
The new criterion improves estimation accuracy under model uncertainty
Necessary conditions for optimal designs are derived
Abstract
We consider the problem of designing experiments for the estimation of a target in regression analysis if there is uncertainty about the parametric form of the regression function. A new optimality criterion is proposed, which minimizes the asymptotic mean squared error of the frequentist model averaging estimate by the choice of an experimental design. Necessary conditions for the optimal solution of a locally and Bayesian optimal design problem are established. The results are illustrated in several examples and it is demonstrated that Bayesian optimal designs can yield a reduction of the mean squared error of the model averaging estimator up to .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOptimal Experimental Design Methods · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
