Why Might the Standard Large $N$ Analysis Fail in the O($N$) Model: The Role of Cusps in the Fixed Point Potentials
Shunsuke Yabunaka, Bertrand Delamotte

TL;DR
This paper reveals that the standard large N analysis of the O(N) model misses certain fixed points with cusp singularities at N=infinity, which significantly influence finite N multicritical behavior and are likely a general phenomenon.
Contribution
It demonstrates the failure of traditional large N methods to capture fixed points with cusp singularities in the O(N) model and related models, highlighting a new mechanism affecting multicritical physics.
Findings
Identification of fixed points with cusp singularities at N=infinity
Demonstration of the physical impact of these fixed points at finite N
Evidence that the mechanism is likely generic across similar models
Abstract
The large expansion plays a fundamental role in quantum and statistical field theory. We show on the example of the O model that at , its traditional implementation misses in all dimensions below four some fixed points of the renormalization group. These new fixed points show singularities at in their effective potential that become a boundary layer at finite . We show that they have a physical impact on the multicritcal physics of the ) model at finite . We also show that the mechanism at play holds also for the O()O(2) model and is thus probably generic.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
