Non-Hermitian topology: a unifying framework for the Andreev versus Majorana states controversy
J. Avila, F. Pe\~naranda, E. Prada, P. San-Jose, R. Aguado

TL;DR
This paper uses non-Hermitian topology to clarify the controversy between Andreev bound states and Majorana zero modes, showing that some ABSs are actually non-trivial MZMs with similar properties, explained through exceptional point bifurcations.
Contribution
It introduces a non-Hermitian topological framework to unify the understanding of ABSs and MZMs, resolving the ABS versus MZM controversy.
Findings
Some ABSs are non-trivial MZMs with zero energy.
Zero energy ABSs can exhibit conductance quantization similar to MZMs.
Exceptional point bifurcations explain the emergence of zero modes.
Abstract
Andreev bound states (ABSs) in hybrid semiconductor-superconductor nanowires can have near-zero energy in parameter regions where band topology predicts trivial phases. This surprising fact has been used to challenge the interpretation of a number of transport experiments in terms of non-trivial topology with Majorana zero modes (MZMs). We show that this ongoing ABS versus MZM controversy is fully clarified when framed in the language of non-Hermitian topology, the natural description for open quantum systems. This change of paradigm allows us to understand topological transitions and the emergence of pairs of zero modes more broadly, in terms of exceptional point (EP) bifurcations of system eigenvalue pairs in the complex plane. Within this framework, we show that some zero energy ABSs are actually non-trivial, and share all the properties of conventional MZMs, such as the recently…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
