Bias due to neutrinos must not uncorrect'd go
Sunny Vagnozzi, Thejs Brinckmann, Maria Archidiacono, Katherine, Freese, Martina Gerbino, Julien Lesgourgues, Tim Sprenger

TL;DR
This paper addresses the impact of neutrino-induced scale-dependent galaxy bias on cosmological parameter estimation, providing a practical correction method crucial for future galaxy surveys like Euclid.
Contribution
It introduces a simple prescription to mitigate neutrino bias effects in galaxy clustering analyses, including implementation details with redshift-space distortions and non-linearities.
Findings
Neutrino bias causes significant shifts in $M_{\nu}$ estimates.
Correcting bias affects other parameters like $\Omega_{c\rm dm}h^2$ and $n_s$.
The proposed method improves future survey analyses.
Abstract
In cosmologies with massive neutrinos, the galaxy bias defined with respect to the total matter field (cold dark matter, baryons, and non-relativistic neutrinos) depends on the sum of the neutrino masses , and becomes scale-dependent even on large scales. This effect has been usually neglected given the sensitivity of current surveys, but becomes a severe systematic for future surveys aiming to provide the first detection of non-zero . The effect can be corrected for by defining the bias with respect to the density field of cold dark matter and baryons instead of the total matter field. In this work, we provide a simple prescription for correctly mitigating the neutrino-induced scale-dependent bias effect in a practical way. We clarify a number of subtleties regarding how to properly implement this correction in the presence of redshift-space distortions and non-linear…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
