A Multimessenger Picture of the Flaring Blazar TXS 0506+056: implications for High-Energy Neutrino Emission and Cosmic Ray Acceleration
A. Keivani, K. Murase, M. Petropoulou, D. B. Fox, S. B. Cenko, S., Chaty, A. Coleiro, J. J. DeLaunay, S. Dimitrakoudis, P. A. Evans, J. A., Kennea, F. E. Marshall, A. Mastichiadis, J. P. Osborne, M. Santander, A., Tohuvavohu, and C. F. Turley

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the flaring blazar TXS 0506+056 using multimessenger data to understand its particle acceleration and neutrino emission, highlighting the importance of cascade effects and the implications for cosmic-ray acceleration.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive, physically consistent model of TXS 0506+056's emissions, constraining its neutrino and cosmic-ray outputs, and emphasizes the role of electromagnetic cascades in multimessenger observations.
Findings
A hybrid leptonic model explains the emissions and neutrino production.
X-ray emissions better probe hadronic processes than gamma-ray emissions.
Conditions in the jet are optimal for neutrino production but not for ultra-high-energy cosmic rays.
Abstract
Detection of the IceCube-170922A neutrino coincident with the flaring blazar TXS 0506+056, the first and only 3-sigma high-energy neutrino source association to date, offers a potential breakthrough in our understanding of high-energy cosmic particles and blazar physics. We present a comprehensive analysis of TXS 0506+056 during its flaring state, using newly collected Swift, NuSTAR, and X-shooter data with Fermi observations and numerical models to constrain the blazar's particle acceleration processes and multimessenger (electromagnetic and high-energy neutrino) emissions. Accounting properly for electromagnetic cascades in the emission region, we find a physically-consistent picture only within a hybrid leptonic scenario, with gamma-rays produced by external inverse-Compton processes and high-energy neutrinos via a radiatively-subdominant hadronic component. We derive robust…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
