Can Somebody Please Say What Gibbsian Statistical Mechanics Says?
Roman Frigg, Charlotte Werndl

TL;DR
This paper critically examines Gibbsian statistical mechanics, clarifying its ambiguous aspects and proposing a coherent interpretation of the Averaging Principle to better connect theory with experimental practice.
Contribution
It offers a new interpretation of GSM that clarifies the role and scope of the Averaging Principle, resolving longstanding ambiguities.
Findings
Clarifies the ambiguous status of the Averaging Principle in GSM
Provides a coherent interpretation linking GSM to experimental practice
Resolves conceptual difficulties in understanding GSM's claims
Abstract
Gibbsian statistical mechanics (GSM) is the most widely used version of statistical mechanics among working physicists. Yet a closer look at GSM reveals that it is unclear what the theory actually says and how it bears on experimental practice. The root cause of the difficulties is the status of the Averaging Principle, the proposition that what we observe in an experiment is the ensemble average of a phase function. We review different stances toward this principle, and eventually present a coherent interpretation of GSM that provides an account of the status and scope of the principle.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Mechanics and Entropy · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Theoretical and Computational Physics
