X-shooting GRBs at high redshift: probing dust production history
T. Zafar, P. M{\o}ller, D. Watson, J. Lattanzio, A. M. Hopkins, A., Karakas, J. P. U. Fynbo, N. R. Tanvir, J. Selsing, P. Jakobsson, K. E., Heintz, D. A. Kann, B. Groves, V. Kulkarni, S. Covino, V. D'Elia, J. Japelj,, D. Corre, S. Vergani

TL;DR
This study investigates dust properties in high-redshift galaxies using gamma-ray burst afterglow extinction, revealing a significant decrease in dust content above redshift 3.5, which suggests a transition in dust production or galaxy evolution.
Contribution
It provides new extinction curves for z>3 GRBs and demonstrates a decline in dust content at high redshifts, indicating changes in dust production mechanisms or galaxy properties.
Findings
Average extinction curve similar to SMC-Bar.
Drop in visual extinction (A_V) above z>3.5.
Detectability of GRBs up to z~8 with low dust content.
Abstract
Evolved asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars and Type Ia supernovae (SNe) are important contributors to the elements that form dust in the interstellar medium of galaxies, in particular, carbon and iron. However, they require at least a Gyr to start producing these elements, therefore, a change in dust quantity or properties may appear at high redshifts. In this work, we use extinction of gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows as a tool to look for variations in dust properties at z>3. We use a spectroscopically selected sample of GRB afterglows observed with the VLT/X-shooter instrument to determine extinction curves out to high redshifts. We present ten new z>3 X-shooter GRBs of which six are dusty. Combining these with individual extinction curves of three previously known z>3 GRBs, we find an average extinction curve consistent with the SMC-Bar. A comparison with spectroscopically selected…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
