Recurring questions that sustain the sensemaking frame
Tor Ole B. Odden, Rosemary S. Russ

TL;DR
This study identifies how recurring questions in student discussions can serve as anchors that sustain and deepen the sensemaking process in physics education, highlighting their importance in fostering meaningful understanding.
Contribution
It provides evidence that specific recurring questions play a crucial role in maintaining and extending students' sensemaking in physics classrooms, a novel insight into instructional strategies.
Findings
Recurring questions mark entry into sensemaking
Questions based on perceived gaps recur to sustain understanding
Recurrences help stabilize and extend sensemaking process
Abstract
Many physics instructors aim to support student sensemaking in their classrooms. However, this can be challenging since instances of sensemaking tend to be short-lived, with students often defaulting to approaches based on answer-making or rote mathematical manipulation. In this study, we present evidence that specific recurring questions can serve a key role in the sensemaking process. Using a case-study of two students discussing an E&M thought experiment, we show how students' entry into sensemaking is marked by the articulation of a particular question, based on a perceived gap or inconsistency in understanding and how this question recurs throughout their subsequent explanations, arguing that these recurrences may serve to stabilize and extend the process.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
