Fine-scale population structure analysis in Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda: Oniscidea) reveals strong female philopatry
Sylvine Durand, Fr\'ed\'eric Grandjean, Isabelle Giraud, Richard, Cordaux, Sophie Beltran-Bech, Nicolas Bech

TL;DR
This study investigates sex-biased dispersal in Armadillidium vulgare, revealing strong female philopatry through fine-scale genetic structure analysis, which supports classical hypotheses related to parental care and mating competition.
Contribution
It provides the first fine-scale genetic evidence of female philopatry in A. vulgare, linking dispersal patterns to reproductive investment and social behavior.
Findings
Females show significant genetic structuring at small spatial scales.
Males do not exhibit significant genetic structure at the same scale.
Results support hypotheses linking parental care and sex-biased dispersal.
Abstract
In the last decades, dispersal studies have benefited from the use of molecular markers for detecting patterns differing between categories of individuals and have highlighted sex-biased dispersal in several species. To explain this phenomenon, several hypotheses implying mating systems, intrasexual competition or sex-related handicaps have been proposed. In this context, we investigated sex-biased dispersal in Armadillidium vulgare, a terrestrial isopod with a promiscuous mating system. As a proxy for effective dispersal, we performed a fine-scale investigation of the spatial genetic structure in males and females, using individuals originating from five sampling points located within 70 meters of each other. Based on microsatellite markers and spatial autocorrelation analyses, our results revealed that while males did not present a significant genetic structure at this geographic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
