Probing AGN Inner Structure with X-ray Obscured Type 1 AGN
Teng Liu, Andrea Merloni, Jun-Xian Wang, Paolo Tozzi, Yue Shen,, Marcella Brusa, Mara Salvato, Kirpal Nandra, Johan Comparat, Zhu Liu,, Gabriele Ponti, Damien Coffey

TL;DR
This study compares properties of X-ray obscured and unobscured broad-line AGN, revealing differences in black hole mass, Eddington ratio, and obscuration characteristics, supporting a multi-component, clumpy torus model with inclination-based classification.
Contribution
It provides observational evidence linking X-ray obscuration with optical dust extinction and intermediate inclination angles in a unified AGN model.
Findings
BLAGN2 have broader emission lines and higher black hole masses.
X-ray obscuration correlates with optical dust extinction.
Results support a multi-component, clumpy torus model.
Abstract
Using the X-ray-selected active galactic nuclei (AGN) from the XMM-XXL north survey and the SDSS Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) spectroscopic follow-up of them, we compare the properties of X-ray unobscured and obscured broad-line AGN (BLAGN1 and BLAGN2; below and above cm), including their X-ray luminosity , black hole mass, Eddington ratio , optical continuum and line features. We find that BLAGN2 have systematically larger broad line widths and hence apparently higher (lower) () than BLAGN1. We also find that the X-ray obscuration in BLAGN tends to coincide with optical dust extinction, which is optically thinner than that in narrow-line AGN (NLAGN) and likely partial-covering to the broad line region. All the results can be explained in the framework of a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
