Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA): Accurate number densities & environments of massive ultracompact galaxies at 0.02 < z < 0.3
F. Buitrago, I. Ferreras, L. S. Kelvin, I. K. Baldry, L. Davies, J., Angthopo, S. Khochfar, A. M. Hopkins, S. P. Driver, S. Brough, J. Sabater, C., J. Conselice, J. Liske, B. W. Holwerda, M. N. Bremer, S. Phillipps, A. R., Lopez-Sanchez, A. W. Graham

TL;DR
This study identifies and characterizes a rare population of massive ultracompact galaxies in the nearby universe, analyzing their properties, environments, and implications for galaxy evolution models.
Contribution
First comprehensive analysis of low-redshift MUGs using GAMA, KiDS, and VIKING data, revealing their number densities, morphologies, and environmental distributions.
Findings
22 confirmed MUGs with high stellar mass and compact size
MUGs have diverse ages, with some being relics
Distributed across various environments, including groups
Abstract
Massive Ultracompact Galaxies (MUGs) are common at z=2-3, but very rare in the nearby Universe. Simulations predict that the few surviving MUGs should reside in galaxy clusters, whose large relative velocities prevent them from merging, thus maintaining their original properties (namely stellar populations, masses, sizes and dynamical state). We take advantage of the high-completeness, large-area spectroscopic GAMA survey, complementing it with deeper imaging from the KiDS and VIKING surveys. We find a set of 22 bona-fide MUGs, defined as having high stellar mass (>8x10^10 M_Sun) and compact size (R_e<2 Kpc) at 0.02 < z < 0.3. An additional set of 7 lower-mass objects (6x10^10 < M_star/M_Sun < 8x10^10) are also potential candidates according to typical mass uncertainties. The comoving number density of MUGs at low redshift (z < 0.3) is constrained at $(1.0\pm 0.4)x 10^-6 Mpc^-3,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
