Top-Quark Physics at the CLIC Electron-Positron Linear Collider
H. Abramowicz, N. Alipour Tehrani, D. Arominski, Y. Benhammou, M., Benoit, J.-J. Blaising, M. Boronat, O. Borysov, R.R. Bosley, I. Bo\v{z}ovi\'c, Jelisav\v{c}i\'c, I. Boyko, S. Brass, E. Brondolin, P. Bruckman de Renstrom,, M. Buckland, P.N. Burrows, M. Chefdeville, S. Chekanov

TL;DR
This paper discusses the potential of the proposed CLIC collider for top-quark physics, including precision measurements, rare decay searches, and BSM sensitivity across multiple energy stages.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of top-quark physics opportunities at CLIC, highlighting new measurement techniques and phenomenological interpretations at different energy stages.
Findings
Precise top-quark mass measurement at 350 GeV threshold scan
Sensitivity to rare FCNC top-quark decays
Enhanced BSM physics reach at higher energies
Abstract
The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) is a proposed future high-luminosity linear electron-positron collider operating at three energy stages, with nominal centre-of-mass energies: 380 GeV, 1.5 TeV, and 3 TeV. Its aim is to explore the energy frontier, providing sensitivity to physics beyond the Standard Model (BSM) and precision measurements of Standard Model processes with an emphasis on Higgs boson and top-quark physics. The opportunities for top-quark physics at CLIC are discussed in this paper. The initial stage of operation focuses on top-quark pair production measurements, as well as the search for rare flavour-changing neutral current (FCNC) top-quark decays. It also includes a top-quark pair production threshold scan around 350 GeV which provides a precise measurement of the top-quark mass in a well-defined theoretical framework. At the higher-energy stages, studies are made of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
