Leptonic and Hadronic Modeling of Fermi-LAT Hard Spectrum Quasars and Predictions for High-Energy Polarization
Vaidehi S. Paliya, Haocheng Zhang, Markus B\"ottcher, M. Ajello, A., Dom\'inguez, M. Joshi, D. Hartmann, and C. S. Stalin

TL;DR
This study models the spectral energy distributions of eight FSRQs using leptonic and hadronic scenarios, predicts their polarization signatures, and assesses their detectability with future high-energy polarimeters and telescopes.
Contribution
It compares leptonic and hadronic models for FSRQ emissions, predicts polarization degrees, and estimates their detectability with upcoming high-energy observatories.
Findings
Hadronic models predict higher high-energy polarization than leptonic models.
X-ray polarization exceeds gamma-ray polarization in leptonic scenarios.
Most FSRQs could be detected by the Cherenkov Telescope Array during elevated activity.
Abstract
We present the results of a study of the time-averaged spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of eight flat spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs) present in the second catalog of high energy sources detected beyond 50 GeV by the {\it Fermi}-Large Area Telescope (2FHL). Both leptonic and hadronic scenarios are adopted to explain the multi-wavelength SEDs and we find them to be marginally consistent with the 2FHL spectra above 50 GeV. We derive the expected degree of X-ray and -ray polarizations both for the average and elevated activity states and note that: (i) a hadronic radiative model consistently predicts a higher degree of high energy polarization compared to leptonic ones, and (ii) the X-ray polarization degree is higher than the -ray polarization in the leptonic scenario, but similar to the -ray polarization if the observed radiation is powered by hadronic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
