Indicatrix geometry clarifies that Finsler length can be larger than relative length
E. Minguzzi

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that Matsumoto's conjectured inequality relating relative length and Finsler length is false, using indicatrix geometry to clarify the relationship between these lengths.
Contribution
It provides a geometric clarification showing that Finsler length can exceed relative length, disproving a longstanding conjecture.
Findings
Matsumoto's inequality is false
Indicatrix geometry explains length relationships
Finsler length can be larger than relative length
Abstract
I show that Matsumoto conjectured inequality between relative length and Finsler length is false. The incorrectness of the claim is easily inferred from the geometry of the indicatrix.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
