TL;DR
This paper introduces the Localization Recall Precision (LRP) Error, a new performance metric for object detection that better captures localization accuracy and provides more discriminative evaluation than the traditional Average Precision (AP).
Contribution
The paper proposes LRP Error and Optimal LRP as novel metrics that improve evaluation of object detectors by directly measuring localization and optimizing confidence thresholds.
Findings
Optimal LRP offers richer evaluation information than AP.
Confidence thresholds vary significantly among classes and detectors.
Class-specific thresholds improve detection accuracy.
Abstract
Average precision (AP), the area under the recall-precision (RP) curve, is the standard performance measure for object detection. Despite its wide acceptance, it has a number of shortcomings, the most important of which are (i) the inability to distinguish very different RP curves, and (ii) the lack of directly measuring bounding box localization accuracy. In this paper, we propose 'Localization Recall Precision (LRP) Error', a new metric which we specifically designed for object detection. LRP Error is composed of three components related to localization, false negative (FN) rate and false positive (FP) rate. Based on LRP, we introduce the 'Optimal LRP', the minimum achievable LRP error representing the best achievable configuration of the detector in terms of recall-precision and the tightness of the boxes. In contrast to AP, which considers precisions over the entire recall domain,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
