Breast Cancer Diagnosis via Classification Algorithms
Reihaneh Entezari

TL;DR
This paper compares various machine learning classifiers on the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer dataset, finding SVM performs best, with Bayesian Logistic Regression closely competing.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of SVM, Bayesian Logistic Regression, and K-Nearest-Neighbors for breast cancer diagnosis.
Findings
SVM outperforms other classifiers on the dataset.
Bayesian Logistic Regression is a strong competitor.
K-Nearest-Neighbors has comparatively lower performance.
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer Data using Machine Learning classification techniques, such as the SVM, Bayesian Logistic Regression (Variational Approximation), and K-Nearest-Neighbors. We describe each model, and compare their performance through different measures. We conclude that SVM has the best performance among all other classifiers, while it competes closely with the Bayesian Logistic Regression that is ranked second best method for this dataset.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAI in cancer detection · Gene expression and cancer classification
MethodsLogistic Regression · Support Vector Machine
