Dynamics of the anisotropic conformal Horava theory versus its kinetic-conformal formulation
Jorge Bellorin, Byron Droguett

TL;DR
This paper compares the dynamics of anisotropic conformal Horava gravity with its kinetic-conformal version, analyzing their constraints, degrees of freedom, and specific solutions, revealing how symmetry breaking affects physical modes.
Contribution
It provides a detailed canonical analysis of both theories, showing how the Weyl symmetry influences constraints and degrees of freedom, and introduces explicit models including the Cotton^2 potential.
Findings
Both theories propagate the same degrees of freedom as General Relativity.
Breaking Weyl symmetry converts a first-class constraint into a second-class constraint.
Explicit conformally flat solutions are found in both theories.
Abstract
We contrast the dynamics of the Horava theory with anisotropic Weyl symmetry with the case when this symmetry is explicitly broken, which is called the kinetic-conformal Horava theory. To do so we perform the canonical formulation of the anisotropic conformal theory at the classical level with a general conformal potential. Both theories have the generator of the anisotropic Weyl transformations as a constraint but it changes from first to second-class when the Weyl symmetry is broken. The FDiff-covariant vector a_i = \partial_i \ln N plays the role of gauge connection for the anisotropic Weyl transformations. A Lagrange multiplier plays also the role of gauge connection, being the time component. The anisotropic conformal theory propagates the same number of degrees of freedom of the kinetic-conformal theory, which in turn are the same of General Relativity. This is due to exchange of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
