TL;DR
This paper develops an analytical model to estimate the observational effort needed for radial velocity follow-up of TESS planets, considering stellar activity and instrument capabilities, and provides a community tool for planning observations.
Contribution
It introduces a formalism to calculate the required radial velocity measurements for TESS planets, including noise models, and offers insights into optimal strategies and instrument choices.
Findings
Optical and near-IR spectrographs perform similarly for most planets.
Characterizing small planets (<4 Earth radii) can require as little as 60 nights.
Near-IR is more efficient for Earth-sized and temperate TESS planets.
Abstract
The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite will conduct a 2-year long wide-field survey searching for transiting planets around bright stars. Many TESS discoveries will be amenable to mass characterization via ground-based radial velocity measurements with any of a growing suite of existing and anticipated velocimeters in the optical and near-infrared. In this study we present an analytical formalism to compute the number of radial velocity measurements---and hence the total observing time---required to characterize RV planet masses with the inclusion of either a white or correlated noise activity model. We use our model to calculate the total observing time required to measure all TESS planet masses from the expected TESS planet yield while relying on our current understanding of the targeted stars, stellar activity, and populations of unseen planets which inform the expected radial…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
