Radio observations of planetary nebulae: no evidence for strong radial density gradients
Marcin Hajduk (1), Peter A. M. van Hoof (2), Karolina \'Sniadkowska, (1), Andrzej Krankowski (1), Leszek B{\l}aszkiewicz (1,3), Bartosz, D\k{a}browski (1), Albert A. Zijlstra (4)

TL;DR
This study analyzes radio observations of planetary nebulae to evaluate models of their density structures, finding limited evidence for strong radial density gradients and supporting the prolate ellipsoidal shell model for many cases.
Contribution
The paper provides an extensive analysis of radio spectra to test existing nebular models, challenging the prevalence of radial density gradients in planetary nebulae.
Findings
About 50% of nebulae can exclude density gradients.
No nebulae show the spectral index of 0.6 in optically thick regions.
Radio spectra fit well with prolate ellipsoidal shell models.
Abstract
Radio continuum observations trace thermal emission of ionized plasma in planetary nebulae and bring useful information on nebular geometries. A model of homogeneous sphere or shell cannot fit the nebular spectra and brightness temperatures. Two alternative models have been proposed in the literature: the first one consists of two homogeneous components, while the other one is a model of a shell with a significant radial density gradient. On the other side, prolate ellipsoidal shell model can successfully fit the surface brightness distribution of selected objects. We verify the existing models using data collected in radio surveys covering wide range of frequencies. In about 50% cases, density gradient can be excluded, and none of the remaining objects could be confirmed. None of the observed planetary nebulae show the spectral index of 0.6 in the optically thick part of the spectrum,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
