Experimental test of measurement dependent local Bell inequality with human free will
Yang Liu, Xiao Yuan, Cheng Wu, Weijun Zhang, Jian-Yu Guan, Jiaqiang, Zhong, Hao Li, Ming-Han Li, Carlos Abellan, Morgan W. Mitchell, Sheng-Cai, Shi, Jingyun Fan, Lixing You, Zhen Wang, Xiongfeng Ma, Qiang Zhang and, Jian-Wei Pan

TL;DR
This paper reports an experimental test of a measurement dependent Bell inequality using human-generated random numbers, demonstrating violation that constrains local hidden variable models with limited measurement independence.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed experimental validation of measurement dependent Bell inequalities with human choices, addressing the measurement independence assumption.
Findings
Bell inequality violation confirmed with human randomness
Measurement independence parameter constrained to l > 0.10 ± 0.05
Supports the nonlocal nature of quantum correlations with human-influenced settings
Abstract
A Bell test can rule out local realistic models, and has potential applications in communications and information tasks. For example, a Bell inequality violation can certify the presence of intrinsic randomness in measurement outcomes, which then can be used to generate unconditional randomness. A Bell test requires, however, measurements that are chosen independently of other physical variables in the test, as would be the case if the measurement settings were themselves unconditionally random. This situation seems to create a "bootstrapping problem" that was recently addressed in The BIG Bell Test, a collection of Bell tests and related tests using human setting choices. Here we report in detail our experimental methods and results within the BIG Bell Test. We perform a experimental test of a special type of Bell inequality - the measurement dependent local inequality. With this…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
