Hypergraph Lagrangians I: the Frankl-F\"uredi conjecture is false
Vytautas Gruslys, Shoham Letzter, Natasha Morrison

TL;DR
This paper disproves the longstanding Frankl-F"uredi conjecture by providing counterexamples for all uniformities r ≥ 4, while also identifying conditions under which the conjecture holds for large parameters.
Contribution
It introduces an infinite family of counterexamples to the Frankl-F"uredi conjecture for r ≥ 4 and delineates the parameter range where the conjecture remains valid.
Findings
Counterexamples for all r ≥ 4
Conjecture holds for large t within specific bounds
Disproves the universality of the conjecture
Abstract
An old and well-known conjecture of Frankl and F\"{u}redi states that the Lagrangian of an -uniform hypergraph with edges is maximised by an initial segment of colex. In this paper we disprove this conjecture by finding an infinite family of counterexamples for all . We also show that, for sufficiently large , the conjecture is true in the range .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
