Monitoring Hyperproperties
Bernd Finkbeiner, Christopher Hahn, Marvin Stenger, Leander Tentrup

TL;DR
This paper explores the runtime verification of HyperLTL, a logic for hyperproperties, across different input models, providing complexity results, algorithms, and optimizations to improve scalability and memory efficiency.
Contribution
It introduces the monitorability decision problem for HyperLTL, analyzes its complexity, and offers practical algorithms with optimizations for scalable monitoring.
Findings
Monitorability is PSPACE-complete for various models.
Optimizations significantly reduce memory usage.
Algorithms enable practical runtime verification of hyperproperties.
Abstract
Hyperproperties, such as non-interference and observational determinism, relate multiple system executions to each other. They are not expressible in standard temporal logics, like LTL, CTL, and CTL*, and thus cannot be monitored with standard runtime verification techniques. HyperLTL extends linear-time temporal logic (LTL) with explicit quantification over traces in order to express Hyperproperties. We investigate the runtime verification problem of HyperLTL formulas for three different input models: (1) The parallel model, where a fixed number of system executions is processed in parallel. (2) The unbounded sequential model, where system executions are processed sequentially, one execution at a time. In this model, the number of incoming executions may grow forever. (3) The bounded sequential model where the traces are processed sequentially and the number of incoming executions is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLogic, programming, and type systems · Distributed systems and fault tolerance · Formal Methods in Verification
