Reliable Gene Mutation Prediction in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma through Multi-classifier Multi-objective Radiogenomics Model
Xi Chen, Zhiguo Zhou, Raquibul Hannan, Kimberly Thomas, Ivan Pedrosa,, Payal Kapur, James Brugarolas, Xuanqin Mou, Jing Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel multi-classifier multi-objective radiogenomics model that improves non-invasive prediction of gene mutations in clear cell renal cell carcinoma by integrating multiple classifiers and optimizing for sensitivity and specificity.
Contribution
The study presents a new multi-classifier multi-objective model with a similarity-based optimization algorithm and evidential reasoning fusion, enhancing prediction reliability over existing methods.
Findings
Achieved AUC over 0.86 for key gene mutations
Outperformed individual classifiers and other fusion strategies
Demonstrated association between CT features and gene mutations
Abstract
Genetic studies have identified associations between gene mutations and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Because the complete gene mutational landscape cannot be characterized through biopsy and sequencing assays for each patient, non-invasive tools are needed to determine the mutation status for tumors. Radiogenomics may be an attractive alternative tool to identify disease genomics by analyzing amounts of features extracted from medical images. Most current radiogenomics predictive models are built based on a single classifier and trained through a single objective. However, since many classifiers are available, selecting an optimal model is difficult. On the other hand, a single objective may not be a good measure to guide model training. We proposed a new multi-classifier multi-objective (MCMO) radiogenomics predictive model. To obtain more reliable prediction results,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
