Reply to comment "Divergent and Ultrahigh Thermal Conductivity in Millimeter-Long Nanotubes"
Victor Lee, Chi-Hsun Wu, Zong-Xing Lou, Wei-Li Lee, and Chih-Wei Chang
TL;DR
This paper defends the validity of previous research on ultrahigh thermal conductivity in millimeter-long nanotubes, emphasizing the correctness of their original findings despite rejection of their reply.
Contribution
The authors provide a rebuttal to criticisms of their work, reaffirming the accuracy of their original measurements and conclusions on nanotube thermal conductivity.
Findings
Original work on ultrahigh thermal conductivity is sound
Rebuttal clarifies misunderstandings or criticisms
Authors stand by their original experimental results
Abstract
We regret that PRL did not accept our Reply for publication. We believe that both our Reply and the original paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 135901 (2017)) is sound and correct. We post our reply here and let readers to judge.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsThermal properties of materials · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Fullerene Chemistry and Applications