Can justice be fair when it is blind? How social network structures can promote or prevent the evolution of despotism
Cedric Perret, Simon T. Powers, Jeremy Pitt, Emma Hart

TL;DR
This study explores how social network structures influence the evolution of despotism, showing that highly centralized networks promote despotism, while increased connectedness among followers can limit it.
Contribution
It demonstrates through simulations that network connectedness affects despotism evolution, highlighting the role of social structure in promoting or preventing despotic leadership.
Findings
Highly centralized networks increase despotism due to influential cliques.
Greater connectedness among followers reduces despotism levels.
Network structure significantly impacts the co-evolution of leadership and follower tolerance.
Abstract
Hierarchy is an efficient way for a group to organize, but often goes along with inequality that benefits leaders. To control despotic behaviour, followers can assess leaders decisions by aggregating their own and their neighbours experience, and in response challenge despotic leaders. But in hierarchical social networks, this interactional justice can be limited by (i) the high influence of a small clique who are treated better, and (ii) the low connectedness of followers. Here we study how the connectedness of a social network affects the co-evolution of despotism in leaders and tolerance to despotism in followers. We simulate the evolution of a population of agents, where the influence of an agent is its number of social links. Whether a leader remains in power is controlled by the overall satisfaction of group members, as determined by their joint assessment of the leaders…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
