TL;DR
This paper applies an internal robustness analysis to recent $f\sigma_8(z)$ data, validating its consistency and lack of anomalies through Bayesian model comparison and various cross-checks.
Contribution
It introduces a Bayesian internal robustness method to assess the consistency of growth rate data and validates its effectiveness with real and mock data.
Findings
No anomalies found in the data set
Data set is internally robust
Method can detect outliers or systematics
Abstract
We perform an Internal Robustness analysis (iR) to a compilation of the most recent data, using the framework of 1209.1897. The method analyzes combinations of subsets in the data set in a Bayesian model comparison way, potentially finding outliers, subsets of data affected by systematics or new physics. In order to validate our analysis and assess its sensitivity we performed several cross-checks, for example by removing some of the data or by adding artificially contaminated points, while we also generated mock data sets in order to estimate confidence regions of the iR. Applying this methodology, we found no anomalous behavior in the data set, thus validating its internal robustness.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
