
TL;DR
This paper investigates signal recovery using cumulative coherence, demonstrating the equivalence of Lasso and Dantzig selector, and establishing the advantages of cumulative coherence for sparse signal recovery through theoretical analysis and numerical experiments.
Contribution
It establishes the relationship between Lasso and Dantzig selector under cumulative coherence and shows the benefits of cumulative coherence for sparse signal recovery.
Findings
Lasso and Dantzig selector behave similarly under cumulative coherence
Cumulative coherence implies the restricted eigenvalue condition
Numerical experiments show advantages for three matrix classes
Abstract
This paper considers signal recovery in the framework of cumulative coherence. First, we show that the Lasso estimator and the Dantzig selector exhibit similar behavior under the cumulative coherence. Then we estimate the approximation equivalence between the Lasso and the Dantzig selector by calculating prediction loss difference under the condition of cumulative coherence. And we also prove that the cumulative coherence implies the restricted eigenvalue condition. Last, we illustrate the advantages of cumulative coherence condition for three class matrices, in terms of the recovery performance of sparse signals via extensive numerical experiments.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
