Static Internal Representation Of Dynamic Situations Reveals Time Compaction In Human Cognition
Jose Antonio Villacorta-Atienza (1,2), Carlos Calvo-Tapia (2), Sergio, Diez-Hermano (1), Abel Sanchez-Jimenez (1,2), Sergey Lobov (3), Nadia Krilova, (3), Antonio Murciano (1), Gabriela Lopez-Tolsa (4), Ricardo Pellon (4),

TL;DR
This study investigates how humans internally represent dynamic situations as static maps, revealing gender differences and supporting the idea of time compaction as a cognitive strategy, validated through behavioral experiments and a mathematical model.
Contribution
It provides empirical evidence and a mathematical model supporting the hypothesis that the brain uses static internal representations to process dynamic situations, highlighting gender differences.
Findings
Men's performance was influenced by prior static scene exposure, indicating time compaction.
Women showed consistent performance regardless of prior static scene exposure.
The mathematical model corroborated the role of static internal representations in dynamic decision-making.
Abstract
The time-changing nature of our world demands processing of huge amounts of information in fast and reliable way to generate successful behaviors. Therefore, significant brain resources are devoted to process spatiotemporal information. Neural basis of spatial processing and their cognitive correlates are well established mostly for static environments. Nonetheless, in time-changing situations the brain exploits specific processing mechanisms for temporal information based on prediction and anticipation, as time compression during visual perception and mental navigation. Alternative hypothesis of time compaction integrates both views, postulating that dynamic situations are internally represented as static spatial maps where temporal information is extracted by predicting and structuring the relevant interactions. Nevertheless, empirical approaches tackling the biological soundness of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
