Difficulties of Quantitative Tests of the Kerr-Hypothesis with X-Ray Observations of Mass Accreting Black Holes
Henric Krawczynski (Washington University in Saint Louis, McDonnell, Center for the Space Sciences)

TL;DR
This paper reviews the challenges in quantitatively testing the Kerr hypothesis using X-ray observations of accreting black holes, highlighting current limitations due to astrophysical uncertainties and discussing future prospects with advanced observational techniques.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive review of recent test metrics and assesses the current status and difficulties in constraining black hole spacetimes with X-ray data.
Findings
Astrophysical uncertainties overshadow small observational differences.
Quantitative constraints on deviations from Kerr are currently unfeasible.
Future missions and simulations may improve testing capabilities.
Abstract
X-ray studies of stellar mass black holes in X-ray binaries and mass-accreting supermassive black holes in Active Galactic Nuclei have achieved a high degree of maturity and have delivered detailed information about the astrophysical sources and the physics of black hole accretion. In this article, I review recent progress made towards using the X-ray observations for testing the "Kerr hypothesis" that the background spacetimes of all astrophysical quasi-stationary black holes are described by the Kerr metric. Although the observations have indeed revealed clear evidence for relativistic effects in strong-field gravity, quantitative tests of the Kerr hypothesis still struggle with theoretical and practical difficulties. In this article, I describe several recently introduced test metrics and review the status of constraining the background spacetimes of mass accreting stellar mass and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
