Updated Compositional Models of the TRAPPIST-1 Planets
Cayman T. Unterborn, Natalie R. Hinkel, Steven J. Desch

TL;DR
This study updates the mass-radius-composition models of the TRAPPIST-1 planets using new mass data, revealing possible volatile contents and core sizes, and emphasizing the importance of oxidized, core-less models for understanding their compositions.
Contribution
The paper provides revised compositional models of TRAPPIST-1 planets incorporating updated mass data, highlighting the potential for significant volatile layers and the importance of considering oxidized, core-less planetary models.
Findings
Planets b, d, and g likely have small water contents if cores are small.
Planets c, e, f, and h can have volatile envelopes up to 35 wt%.
A pure MgSiO₃ planet is not the lowest density model for volatile assessment.
Abstract
After publication of our initial mass-radius-composition models for the TRAPPIST-1 system in Unterborn et al. (2018), the planet masses were updated in Grimm et al. (2018). We had originally adopted the data set of Wang et al., 2017 who reported different densities than the updated values. The differences in observed density change the inferred volatile content of the planets. Grimm et al. (2018) report TRAPPIST-1 b, d, f, g, and h as being consistent with <5 wt% water and TRAPPIST-1 c and e has having largely rocky interiors. Here, we present updated results recalculating water fractions and potential alternative compositions using the Grimm et al., 2018 masses. Overall, we can only reproduce the results of Grimm et al., 2018 of planets b, d and g having small water contents if the cores of these planets are small (<23 wt%). We show that, if the cores for these planets are roughly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
