CXOU J160103.1-513353: another CCO with a carbon atmosphere?
V. Doroshenko, V. Suleimanov, A. Santangelo

TL;DR
This study analyzes XMM-Newton data of the CCO CXOU J160103.1-513353, suggesting a carbon atmosphere is more likely than hydrogen, based on spectral modeling and pulsation constraints.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed spectral analysis of this CCO, favoring a carbon atmosphere model over hydrogen, and discusses implications for neutron star surface compositions.
Findings
Spectral data fit well with carbon or two-component hydrogen atmosphere models.
Pulsation non-detection can be explained by orientation or surface composition.
Carbon atmosphere scenario is more plausible for this CCO.
Abstract
We report on the analysis of XMM-Newton observations of the central compact object CXOU J160103.1-513353 located in the center of the non-thermally emitting supernova remnant (SNR) G330.2+1.0. The X-ray spectrum of the source is well described with either single-component carbon or two-component hydrogen atmosphere models. In the latter case, the observed spectrum is dominated by the emission from a hot component with a temperature ~3.9MK, corresponding to the emission from a hotspot occupying ~1% of the stellar surface (assuming a neutron star with mass M = 1.5M, radius of 12 km, and distance of ~5 kpc as determined for the SNR). The statistics of the spectra and obtained upper limits on the pulsation amplitude expected for a rotating neutron star with hot spots do not allow us to unambiguously distinguish between these two scenarios. We discuss, however, that while the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
