Superluminal motion of a relativistic jet in the neutron star merger GW170817
K. P. Mooley (NRAO, Caltech), A. T. Deller (Swinburne, OzGrav), O., Gottlieb (Tel Aviv), E. Nakar (Tel Aviv), G. Hallinan (Caltech), S. Bourke, (Chalmers), D.A. Frail (NRAO), A. Horesh (HUJI), A. Corsi (TTU), K., Hotokezaka (Princeton)

TL;DR
This paper reports the first direct observation of superluminal motion in the relativistic jet of GW170817, confirming the presence of a narrowly collimated jet from a neutron star merger, linking it to short gamma-ray bursts.
Contribution
It provides the first direct imaging evidence of a collimated relativistic jet in GW170817, clarifying the nature of its afterglow emission and jet structure.
Findings
Detection of superluminal motion in the radio source
Evidence for a narrow jet with <5° opening angle
Confirmation of a relativistic jet powering late-time emission
Abstract
The binary neutron star merger GW170817 was accompanied by radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum and localized to the galaxy NGC 4993 at a distance of 41+/-3 Mpc. The radio and X-ray afterglows of GW170817 exhibited delayed onset, a gradual rise in the emission with time as t^0.8, a peak at about 150 days post-merger, followed by a relatively rapid decline. To date, various models have been proposed to explain the afterglow emission, including a choked-jet cocoon and a successful-jet cocoon (a.k.a. structured jet). However, the observational data have remained inconclusive as to whether GW170817 launched a successful relativistic jet. Here we show, through Very Long Baseline Interferometry, that the compact radio source associated with GW170817 exhibits superluminal motion between two epochs at 75 and 230 days post-merger. This measurement breaks the degeneracy between the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
