Clockwork Axions in Cosmology: Is Chromonatural Inflation Chrononatural?
Prateek Agrawal, JiJi Fan, and Matthew Reece

TL;DR
This paper examines whether clockwork mechanisms can explain large axion-gauge field couplings in cosmology, finding constraints that challenge certain UV completions like clockwork, and discussing alternative approaches and their implications.
Contribution
It analyzes the feasibility of clockwork constructions for axion models with large couplings, revealing constraints that limit their applicability in cosmological theories.
Findings
Clockwork constructions impose a bound < F_a on the scale in the potential.
Clockwork may not be viable for sub-Planckian field ranges in chromonatural inflation.
Alternative methods like large charge fields or kinetic mixing have limitations or require lighter axions.
Abstract
Many cosmological models rely on large couplings of axions to gauge fields. Examples include theories of magnetogenesis, inflation on a steep potential, chiral gravitational waves, and chromonatural inflation. Such theories require a mismatch between the axion field range and the mass scale appearing in the coupling. This mismatch suggests an underlying monodromy, with the axion winding around its fundamental period a large number of times. We investigate the extent to which this integer can be explained as a product of smaller integers in a UV completion: in the parlance of our times, can the theory be "clockworked"? We argue that a clockwork construction producing a potential for an axion of fundamental period will obey the constraint . For some applications, including chromonatural inflation with sub-Planckian field…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
