A Machine-learning framework for automatic reference-free quality assessment in MRI
Thomas K\"ustner, Sergios Gatidis, Annika Liebgott, Martin Schwartz,, Lukas Mauch, Petros Martirosian, Holger Schmidt, Nina F. Schwenzer,, Konstantin Nikolaou, Fabian Bamberg, Bin Yang, Fritz Schick

TL;DR
This paper introduces a machine-learning framework for automatic, reference-free MRI image quality assessment that mimics human observer judgments, achieving high accuracy and enabling efficient quality control during and after scans.
Contribution
It presents a novel machine-learning approach trained on human observer labels, incorporating active learning for efficient annotation, to assess MRI quality without reference images.
Findings
Achieved 93.7% accuracy in quality classification
Utilized support-vector-machine and deep neural networks
Demonstrated effectiveness on a cohort of 250 patients
Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging offers a wide variety of imaging techniques. A large amount of data is created per examination which needs to be checked for sufficient quality in order to derive a meaningful diagnosis. This is a manual process and therefore time- and cost-intensive. Any imaging artifacts originating from scanner hardware, signal processing or induced by the patient may reduce the image quality and complicate the diagnosis or any image post-processing. Therefore, the assessment or the ensurance of sufficient image quality in an automated manner is of high interest. Usually no reference image is available or difficult to define. Therefore, classical reference-based approaches are not applicable. Model observers mimicking the human observers (HO) can assist in this task. Thus, we propose a new machine-learning-based reference-free MR image quality assessment framework…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
