An epistemic interpretation of quantum probability via contextuality
Claudio Garola

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that quantum probability can be interpreted epistemically using classical probability measures on contextual sets, explaining quantum non-Kolmogorovian structure through macroscopic and microscopic contexts.
Contribution
It introduces a framework using classical probability measures on contexts to interpret quantum probabilities epistemically, bridging classical and quantum probability structures.
Findings
Quantum probability can be epistemically interpreted with classical measures.
The framework explains the distinction between compatible and incompatible properties.
Classical conditional probabilities coexist with quantum conditional probabilities.
Abstract
According to a standard view, quantum mechanics (QM) is a contextual theory and quantum probability does not satisfy Kolmogorov's axioms. We show, by considering the macroscopic contexts associated with measurement procedures and the microscopic contexts (mu-contexts) underlying them, that one can interpret quantum probability as epistemic, despite its non-Kolmogorovian structure. To attain this result we introduce a predicate language L(x), a classical probability measure on it and a family of classical probability measures on sets of mu contexts, each element of the family corresponding to a (macroscopic) measurement procedure. By using only Kolmogorovian probability measures we can thus define mean conditional probabilities on the set of properties of any quantum system that admit an epistemic interpretation but are not bound to satisfy Kolmogorov's axioms. The generalized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
