Complexity Matching and Requisite Variety
Korosh Mahmoodi, Bruce J. West, Paolo Grigolini

TL;DR
This paper explores how matching the complexity of crucial events, characterized by inverse power law distributions, facilitates synchronization and information transfer between complex systems, with implications for biofeedback therapies.
Contribution
It introduces a novel complexity matching mechanism based on the shared IPL index that enhances synchronization beyond chaos synchronization.
Findings
Complex systems with the same IPL index μ synchronize perfectly.
Crucial events influence information transport and system synchronization.
Complexity matching improves biofeedback therapy effectiveness.
Abstract
Complexity matching characterizes the role of information in interactions between systems and can be traced back to the 1957 Introduction to Cybernetics by Ross Ashby. We argue that complexity can be expressed in terms of crucial events, which are generated by the processes of spontaneous self-organization. Complex processes, ranging from biological to sociological, must satisfy the homeodynamic condition and host crucial events that have recently been shown to drive the information transport between complex systems. We adopt a phenomenological approach, based on the subordination to periodicity that makes it possible to combine homeodynamics and self-organization induced crucial events. The complexity of crucial events is defined by the waiting-time probability density function (PDF) of the intervals between consecutive crucial events, which have an inverse power law (IPL) PDF $\psi…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural dynamics and brain function · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
