Innovative method for reducing uninformative calls in non-invasive prenatal testing
Jaroslav Budis, Juraj Gazdarica, Jan Radvanszky, Gabor Szucs, Marcel, Kucharik, Lucia Strieskova, Iveta Gazdaricova, Maria Harsanyova, Frantisek, Duris, Gabriel Minarik, Martina Sekelska, Balint Nagy, Jan Turna, Tomas, Szemes

TL;DR
This paper introduces a supplementary method analyzing DNA fragment length profiles to reduce uninformative results in non-invasive prenatal testing, aiming to decrease retests and improve diagnostic accuracy.
Contribution
A novel analysis of circulating cell-free DNA length profiles is proposed to complement traditional z-scores in NIPT, reducing uninformative calls and identifying maternal aberrations.
Findings
Substantial reduction in uninformative results when combining methods
Method helps identify maternal aberrations, lowering false positives/negatives
Complementary approach improves overall NIPT reliability
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal testing or NIPT is currently among the top researched topic in obstetric care. While the performance of the current state-of-the-art NIPT solutions achieve high sensitivity and specificity, they still struggle with a considerable number of samples that cannot be concluded with certainty. Such uninformative results are often subject to repeated blood sampling and re-analysis, usually after two weeks, and this period may cause a stress to the future mothers as well as increase the overall cost of the test. We propose a supplementary method to traditional z-scores to reduce the number of such uninformative calls. The method is based on a novel analysis of the length profile of circulating cell free DNA which compares the change in such profiles when random-based and length-based elimination of some fragments is performed. The proposed method is not as accurate as the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
