The PAU Survey: star-galaxy classification with multi narrow-band data
Laura Cabayol, Ignacio Sevilla-Noarbe, Enrique Fern\'andez, Jorge, Carretero, Martin Eriksen, Santiago Serrano, Alex Alarc\'on, Adam Amara,, Ricard Casas, Francisco Javier Castander, Juan de Vicente, Martin Folger,, Juan Garc\'ia-Bellido, Enrique Gaztanaga, Henk Hoekstra

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that using low-resolution spectra from narrow-band photometry and a CNN classifier, stars and galaxies can be distinguished with over 98% accuracy without relying on morphology.
Contribution
It introduces a novel star-galaxy classification method using narrow-band photometry spectra and CNNs, achieving high precision without morphological data.
Findings
Achieved 98.4% purity and 98.8% completeness in star-galaxy separation.
Successfully applied the method to the ALHAMBRA survey for updated classification.
Proved that spectral data alone can effectively classify astronomical objects.
Abstract
Classification of stars and galaxies is a well-known astronomical problem that has been treated using different approaches, most of them relying on morphological information. In this paper, we tackle this issue using the low-resolution spectra from narrow band photometry, provided by the PAUS (Physics of the Accelerating Universe) survey. We find that, with the photometric fluxes from the 40 narrow band filters and without including morphological information, it is possible to separate stars and galaxies to very high precision, 98.4% purity with a completeness of 98.8% for objects brighter than I = 22.5. This precision is obtained with a Convolutional Neural Network as a classification algorithm, applied to the objects' spectra. We have also applied the method to the ALHAMBRA photometric survey and we provide an updated classification for its Gold sample.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
