On the relative strengths of fragments of collection
Zachiri McKenzie

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the relative strength of various fragments of collection in set theory, establishing consistency and conservativity results for theories with restricted collection schemes.
Contribution
It provides new results on the consistency and conservativity of set theories with fragments of collection, especially relating to $ ext{Pi}_n$-collection and strong $ ext{Pi}_n$-collection.
Findings
Proves that certain collection schemes imply the consistency of Zermelo Set Theory.
Shows $ ext{Pi}_{n+3}$-conservativity of $ ext{M}+ ext{Pi}_{n+1} ext{-collection}$ over strong $ ext{Pi}_n$-collection.
Extends results to theories without the powerset axiom, including Kripke-Platek Set Theory.
Abstract
Let be the basic set theory that consists of the axioms of extensionality, emptyset, pair, union, powerset, infinity, transitive containment, -separation and set foundation. This paper studies the relative strength of set theories obtained by adding fragments of the set-theoretic collection scheme to . We focus on two common parameterisations of collection: -collection, which is the usual collection scheme restricted to -formulae, and strong -collection, which is equivalent to -collection plus -separation. The main result of this paper shows that for all , (1) proves the consistency of Zermelo Set Theory plus -collection, (2) the theory is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
