OGLE-2017-BLG-0537: Microlensing Event with a Resolvable Lens in $\lesssim 5$ years from High-resolution Follow-up Observations
Y. K. Jung, C. Han, A. Udalski, A. Gould, M. D. Albrow, S.-J. Chung,, K.-H. Hwang, C.-U. Lee, Y.-H. Ryu, I.-G. Shin, Y. Shvartzvald, J. C. Yee, W., Zang, W. Zhu, S.-M. Cha, D.-J. Kim, H.-W. Kim, S.-L. Kim, D.-J. Lee, Y. Lee,, B.-G. Park, R. W. Pogge, W.-T. Kim, P. Mr\'oz

TL;DR
This paper analyzes a binary-lens microlensing event with a high proper motion, estimating lens properties and demonstrating the potential to resolve the lens from the source within five years through follow-up observations.
Contribution
The study provides detailed analysis of a high proper motion microlensing event and predicts the feasibility of directly imaging the lens in about five years.
Findings
Lens components are separated by ~1.3 times the angular Einstein radius.
Proper motion is the third highest among measured microlensing events.
Estimated lens masses are approximately 0.4 and 0.2 solar masses, at 1.2 kpc distance.
Abstract
We present the analysis of the binary-lens microlensing event OGLE-2017-BLG-0537. The light curve of the event exhibits two strong caustic-crossing spikes among which the second caustic crossing was resolved by high-cadence surveys. It is found that the lens components with a mass ratio are separated in projection by , where is the angular Einstein radius. Analysis of the caustic-crossing part yields ~mas and a lens-source relative proper motion of . The measured is the third highest value among the events with measured proper motions and times higher than the value of typical Galactic bulge events, making the event a strong candidate for follow-up observations to directly image the lens by separating it from the source. From the angular Einstein radius combined with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
