Characterizing multiple instance datasets
Veronika Cheplygina, David M. J. Tax

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the variability of multiple instance learning datasets using a dissimilarity measure based on classifier ROC-curves, revealing that similar datasets can behave very differently, which impacts classifier comparison.
Contribution
It introduces a dataset dissimilarity measure and visualizes dataset variability, highlighting the importance of dataset characteristics in MIL classifier evaluations.
Findings
Conceptually similar datasets can behave very differently.
Dataset dissimilarity correlates with classifier performance.
Recommendations for dataset analysis in MIL comparisons.
Abstract
In many pattern recognition problems, a single feature vector is not sufficient to describe an object. In multiple instance learning (MIL), objects are represented by sets (\emph{bags}) of feature vectors (\emph{instances}). This requires an adaptation of standard supervised classifiers in order to train and evaluate on these bags of instances. Like for supervised classification, several benchmark datasets and numerous classifiers are available for MIL. When performing a comparison of different MIL classifiers, it is important to understand the differences of the datasets, used in the comparison. Seemingly different (based on factors such as dimensionality) datasets may elicit very similar behaviour in classifiers, and vice versa. This has implications for what kind of conclusions may be drawn from the comparison results. We aim to give an overview of the variability of available…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
