Equivalence of Electric, Magnetic and Electromagnetic Chern Numbers for Topological Photonic Crystals
Giuseppe De Nittis, Max Lein

TL;DR
This paper proves that electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic Chern numbers are equivalent in topological photonic crystals, confirming that any of these definitions can be used in bulk-edge correspondence for such media.
Contribution
It provides a rigorous mathematical proof that the three different Chern number definitions in topological photonics are necessarily equal in relevant media.
Findings
All three Chern numbers agree in Haldane's media.
Any one of the three Chern numbers can be used in bulk-edge correspondence.
The proof uses vector bundle theoretic arguments.
Abstract
Haldane predicted an analog of the Integer Quantum Hall Effect in gyrotropic photonic crystals, where the net number of electromagnetic edge modes moving left-to-right is given by a bulk Chern number. His prediction --- topological effects are bona fide wave and not quantum phenomena --- has been confirmed in a number of experiments. However, theoretical physicists have tacitly used three different definitions for the bulk Chern numbers that enter the bulk-edge correspondence --- on the basis of electromagnetic Bloch functions, electric Bloch functions and magnetic Bloch functions. We use vector bundle theoretic arguments to prove that in media such as those considered by Haldane these three potentially different Chern numbers necessarily agree with one another, and consequently, any one of them can be used in Haldane's photonic bulk-edge correspondence.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
